aiRADAR
PricingContact
aiRADAR

aiRADAR by aiNOW

Sources. Signals. Owner review.

aiRADAR monitors agreed public sources and prepares context for owner decisions.

Discuss monitoring

aiRADAR

  • aiRADAR (Agreed-source monitoring)

Monitoring contexts

  • Public mentions
  • Customer feedback
  • Competitor activity
  • Technology news
  • Source rights
  • Owner review

Resources

  • Monitoring notes
  • How we start
  • Questions and answers
  • Describe sources
  • Email aiRADAR

Legal and security

  • Privacy
  • Terms of service
  • contact@ainow.ge
  • Tbilisi, Georgia
შპს ეი აი ნაუ © 2026. All rights reserved.
contact@ainow.geBack to top ↑

aiRADAR · security

Agree access and data handling before monitoring

Set the rules for source access, permitted actions, retention, deletion and human review before a report is used.

From source control to owner review

Four stages keep access, evidence and decisions separate.

Access request
Public source
Scope check
Reviewed note
Escalation
Access log

4

review stages

6

control points

Owner

final decision

Source access

Use only the source access and public scope agreed for this monitoring task.

Permitted actions

A report does not authorize trading, paid advertising or another external action.

Human approval

A named reviewer checks the report and remains responsible for the decision.

Retention

Agree how long the report history is needed for this source and business task.

Deletion

Handle deletion requests and source changes through the agreed review process.

Escalation

Surface changed sources and evidence gaps before anyone relies on a signal.

Rules the team can review

01

Define access

Write which public sources and topics are included and what stays outside the scope.

02

Check the source

Review access conditions, changes and the context needed to understand the signal.

03

Approve the next step

The reviewer decides whether to clarify, escalate or leave the signal unconfirmed.

04

Keep the record

Maintain the agreed history and update the scope when a source changes.

What the monitoring report does not authorize

The report is context for a business decision. It does not authorize trading, promised returns, paid campaign activation or private-source use without separate approval.

Why changes need a review

A source can change its page, access conditions or meaning. The owner checks the change and updates the agreed scope before relying on a new signal.

Is aiRADAR a trading or autonomous advertising system?

No. aiRADAR monitors agreed sources and prepares context for review. Investment decisions, returns and autonomous advertising actions are outside its promise.

Questions about access and data

No. It describes access, rights and review controls for a monitoring scope; it does not claim a certification.

No. It prepares context for review. The owner remains responsible for any external or business action.

The change is flagged for review. The owner can update the topic, access, schedule or decision boundary.

No. Private access and data rights need a separate explicit agreement.

There is no single retention period here. Retention is agreed for the source, scope and final terms.

The named owner decides whether to clarify the source, escalate the issue or leave the signal unconfirmed.

Discuss access and data handling

Discuss access and data handling